<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشکده منابع طبیعی</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>مجله منابع طبیعی ایران (منتشر نمی شود)</JournalTitle>
				<Issn></Issn>
				<Volume>55</Volume>
				<Issue>4</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2002</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>-</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>کاربرد روش MCDM در اولویت بندی زیرحوزه ها به منظور کنترل سازه ای سیلاب</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage></FirstPage>
			<LastPage></LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">13063</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>مجید</FirstName>
					<LastName>خلقی</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>1970</Year>
					<Month>01</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>In recent years, flood control projects have been widely applied throughout the country. An important aspect in these projects is a great volume of labor and therefore trends cost involved. Prioritizing the sub-watersheds is practically performed traditionally. The goal of this research is to propose a mathematical method to prioritize and select a better choice. Overall, in these issues, we can us_ different multicriteria decision making (MCDM) method. Most MCDM methods automatically line up the selections and provide the result without incorporating the decision-maker. Among those, the utility additive (UTA) method with greater flexibility was considered in this study since it gives a
greater importance to decision maker. The UTA method constantly asks for selection of the decision
maker through some steps using piecewise linear programming. In this study, 49 sub-watersheds of the Kan River in Northwest of Tehran were evaluated according to 50 years return period of flood, lag time, and fatal-cost damage. The results show that despite the multi-component goal, the K3 (Keshar) sub-basin is number one with regard to practicality. This method can effectively be used in these projects to reduce the high cost in low priority sub-basin.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA"></OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تابع تجمعی ارزش</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">تصمیم گیری</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">چند معیاره</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">رودخانه کن</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">سیلخیزی</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">کنترل سازه ای</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">هزینه</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://ijnr.ut.ac.ir/article_13063_1fb418edc116e837ececae5494c6f31e.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
